Comments on: Mandatory Web Labeling http://www.boogie-blog.com/mandatory-web-labeling.htm An Adult webmasters collection of porn, bizarre links, and random idiocy Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:31:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Boogie , Pornguy Extroidinaire http://www.boogie-blog.com/mandatory-web-labeling.htm#comment-8666 Boogie , Pornguy Extroidinaire Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:12:45 +0000 http://www.boogie-blog.com/mandatory-web-labeling.htm#comment-8666 Hey Smitty, I dont hate republicans. I hate this anti porn agenda. I didnt like it when the democrats were doing it during the clinton administration either. I considered myself a republican up until about 2000 for what its worth. Now i'm just neutral. Dont worry, give me a chance to hate democrats who do this ignorant and thinly vailed shit and I'll be glad to. Hey Smitty,

I dont hate republicans. I hate this anti porn agenda. I didnt like it when the democrats were doing it during the clinton administration either.

I considered myself a republican up until about 2000 for what its worth. Now i’m just neutral.

Dont worry, give me a chance to hate democrats who do this ignorant and thinly vailed shit and I’ll be glad to.

]]> By: Dr Montelbaun http://www.boogie-blog.com/mandatory-web-labeling.htm#comment-8665 Dr Montelbaun Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:42:41 +0000 http://www.boogie-blog.com/mandatory-web-labeling.htm#comment-8665 @smitty: I agree that labelling is not so bad in and of itself. I.e. if the blogger in Boogie's example wants the freedom to post the occasional racy content then he should just rate his blog as R or X or whatever they call it from the get-go. Like Boogie says, anyone who wants to read it will ignore the rating and do so. And pretty much every adult webmaster would be happy to scare off anyone who isn't interested in reading something labelled more harshly than "G". However, if Boogie does just "hate Republicans" then he has good reason for it. The Bush administration obviously has an agenda, based on personal morals, to cripple this industry as much as possible. They'll use any tactic they can pull out of their asses to do it, too. And they constantly pull bullshit like mentioning adult websites and Internet predators in the same paragraph. The two are completely unrelated and like Boogie says, the labelling law has absolutely zero to do with Internet predators. So why mention them? Because the person speaking is purely out to hurt adult webmasters. He has absolutely no interest in protecting children. If one takes into account that the Republican campaign against porn is not meant to protect anyone but instead meant to hurt the industry, one can see why Boogie would rail against this new bill. It's just another salvo of attacks wrapped in a package that looks innocuous, helpful and most importantly -- Constitutionally sound. And no one will defend our industry because to do so would result in being labelled as "against the protection of children." And a law such as this, with its vague wording about rules and punishments and potentially encumbering implementation, is easy to abuse for the personal agendas of politicians and judges. America is not about personal agendas, but these guys want it to be. And that's not okay. @smitty: I agree that labelling is not so bad in and of itself. I.e. if the blogger in Boogie’s example wants the freedom to post the occasional racy content then he should just rate his blog as R or X or whatever they call it from the get-go. Like Boogie says, anyone who wants to read it will ignore the rating and do so. And pretty much every adult webmaster would be happy to scare off anyone who isn’t interested in reading something labelled more harshly than “G”.

However, if Boogie does just “hate Republicans” then he has good reason for it. The Bush administration obviously has an agenda, based on personal morals, to cripple this industry as much as possible. They’ll use any tactic they can pull out of their asses to do it, too. And they constantly pull bullshit like mentioning adult websites and Internet predators in the same paragraph. The two are completely unrelated and like Boogie says, the labelling law has absolutely zero to do with Internet predators. So why mention them? Because the person speaking is purely out to hurt adult webmasters. He has absolutely no interest in protecting children.

If one takes into account that the Republican campaign against porn is not meant to protect anyone but instead meant to hurt the industry, one can see why Boogie would rail against this new bill. It’s just another salvo of attacks wrapped in a package that looks innocuous, helpful and most importantly — Constitutionally sound. And no one will defend our industry because to do so would result in being labelled as “against the protection of children.” And a law such as this, with its vague wording about rules and punishments and potentially encumbering implementation, is easy to abuse for the personal agendas of politicians and judges. America is not about personal agendas, but these guys want it to be. And that’s not okay.

]]> By: smitty http://www.boogie-blog.com/mandatory-web-labeling.htm#comment-8635 smitty Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:54:40 +0000 http://www.boogie-blog.com/mandatory-web-labeling.htm#comment-8635 Oh grow the fuck up already and stop your whining. It's not the end of the Earth because you might have to actually LABEL your site! Fuck, if every other media outlet has been doing it for years without so much as a penny lost, what the fuck is the problem??? I think you just flat out hate Republicans SOOOO much, that you're willing to bite off your nose just to spite your face with your rants...... You're material and blog are pretty cool.... until you start your political rant! Oh grow the fuck up already and stop your whining. It’s not the end of the Earth because you might have to actually LABEL your site! Fuck, if every other media outlet has been doing it for years without so much as a penny lost, what the fuck is the problem???

I think you just flat out hate Republicans SOOOO much, that you’re willing to bite off your nose just to spite your face with your rants……

You’re material and blog are pretty cool…. until you start your political rant!

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.boogie-blog.com/mandatory-web-labeling.htm#comment-8632 Anonymous Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:05:33 +0000 http://www.boogie-blog.com/mandatory-web-labeling.htm#comment-8632 Excellent analysis of the issue. Keep fighting the good fight. ~ law student Excellent analysis of the issue. Keep fighting the good fight.

~ law student

]]> By: Hottie Heaven » Blog Archive » Senate Approves Mandatory Web Labeling http://www.boogie-blog.com/mandatory-web-labeling.htm#comment-8605 Hottie Heaven » Blog Archive » Senate Approves Mandatory Web Labeling Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:45:22 +0000 http://www.boogie-blog.com/mandatory-web-labeling.htm#comment-8605 [...] My friend Boogie does a far better job than I could of explaining the issue. Click here to read his rant on this topic. [...] […] My friend Boogie does a far better job than I could of explaining the issue. Click here to read his rant on this topic. […]

]]>